This time, from Roberta X:
Y'know, it would be paranoid to suggest that Feinstein, et. al. want you disarmed before the bottom drops out -- which the PDF linked above puts at 2027 - 2028 -- but it sure is interesting how Congress has had all manner of free time to spend plotting and attempting to justify infringing a fundamental, Constitutionally-protected right with the sequester rising up before them like a tidal wave.  Priorities send a message.  What does theirs tell you?
The gloves are off, the Great Liberal Push (TM) is on, and the progressives are actually starting to admit that yes, they really do intend is to disarm the populace.  Eventually.  Which would be really disturbing, except that Quinn's First Law points out that liberalism always generates the exact opposite of it's stated intent. 

Think about that, and consider - for the last few months, gun and ammo manufacturers have been  working 24/7 just to to try and meet the immediate demand for their wares. Long term demands are scheduled to keep their factories roaring around the clock for at least the next year, if not longer.  Even in a down economy, with guns and ammo hard to find, more and more people are finding the money and motive to get out and get themselves a handgun, a shotgun, a rifle... or all three.

Sounds to me as if Quinn's First is actually holding up pretty well.

No comments: