A Battle of Wills

A friend of mine at church last night was telling me a story about her son. They had gone over to Grandmas house for a visit, and he decided that he was going to play with one of Grandma's artificial flower arrangements. This, despite the fact that Mama and Gradma had made it clear that those flowers were off limits. We have a saying in our house that codifies these myriad types of rules - "Is it yours? No? Then don't mess with it!"


That day, when he first touched the flowers, Mama corrected him and made it clear that yes, the flowers were still off-limits. No touching! This young man wasn't one to take "No!" for an answer, though. He persisted in his attempts to play with the flowers again.. and again… and again.


After a few more attempts, and repeated corrections and admonitions, he was an absolute wreck - crying, sobbing, and shaking.


Not in remorse. In rage.


Twenty-three times, my friend told me. She kept count. Twenty-three times he tried to do what he was told not to do; twenty-three times he went for those stupid flowers. By the end of it all, he wasn't even trying to play with them any longer. Mama would correct him, tell him no… and he would gather himself, look at her, and then reach out a hand to give the flowers the lightest little touch.


What had started out being about the flowers had devolved into a battle of wills. Come hell or high water, that little boy was going to assert his will in the situation. It was no longer about playing with the flowers, it was all about him looking his mother in the eye and letting her know that what she wanted didn't matter. He was going to do this.


Which brings us to health care reform.


Now, I'm not implying that our representatives in the house and Senate are like disobedient, petulant, whiny little children. As the saying goes, that would be an insult to whiny little kids.


What I do see, however, is the same sort of battle of wills that my friend faced with her son. The House and Senate are desperately trying to find a way - some way, any way - to pass the health care legislation that they crafted late last year. The matter has progressed so far, in fact, that it is no longer about health care at all. Our representatives are unwilling to back off, to reflect, to revisit, to do anything except push the existing legislation forward.


Democrats have already started resigning over the issue. Oh, they may say it's for another reason, and claim that correlation is not causation - but there are an awful lot of career politicians who have decided not to even try and run for re-election next year. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has made it clear that she's willing to pay any price, including sacrificing her party's majority in the House and Senate, in order to see this bill passed.


The "health care debate" is no longer a debate, and it has been a long time since it was about health care. It has devolved into a battle of wills; and for that reason alone, if no other, the current health care bill needs to die. The House and Senate are our elected representatives. They are our civil servants in the political system, whether or not they like it, and whether or not they agree, they are there to shape our federal government accruing to our wills, not theirs.


The American people have made it abundantly clear that the current health care reform bills are off limits. Yet, once again, our members of Congress are gathering themselves, and preparing to push forward legislation that their constituents clearly do not want. Once again, once again, Congress is preparing to look the people they claim to represent in the eye, and tell them "Not your will, but mine."


Once more, they have made it abundantly clear that this is no longer about health care reform, but is instead a battle of wills… and this is a battle of wills that we, the people, dare not loose.


More evidence of the vast conspiracy

No, not the vast right-wing conspiracy. Nor the vast left-wing conspiracy. Pfft. Conspiracies? They hardly rise to the level of grade-school playground clubs.

No, I'm talking about a conspiracy of unimaginable depth. One that will, eventually, shake the foundations of the world and result in a new symbol of unimaginable nightmare... one that will become a universal icon of fear for a thousand generations to come.

I'm speaking, of course, of the Gormogons and the coming Hello Kitty apocalypse.

Witness here, for the first time, as the weapons of the New Hello Kitty Hegemony are revealed:




Actually, that's kind of cute.

Seriously, though - get on the good side of the conspiracy now. While you still can.

Starbucks run, anyone?

Normally, I'm not in favor of overpriced coffee. However, I may have to make an exception and start stopping at Starbucks occasionally:

Starbucks is asking nicely: Could we please, please stop talking about guns?

The Seattle-based coffee giant was thrust in the middle of a gun-control debate it never wanted to have when it refused a request from gun-control groups to ban guns in its stores this winter.




If they tell you where you can live, they can tell how you can worship

Or, more to the point, just forbid it entirely.
According to yesterday's Dallas News, the Dallas (TX) Housing Authority has ordered a halt to Sunday morning worship services in one of the public housing complexes it administers.
This is particularly interesting to me, as I conduct a weekly Bible study at a privately run veteran's center. The center has connections to the VA and HUD, both of which fund (through grants and housing payments) the residents of the center. The idea that a government official decided to rescind multiple 1st amendment rights (freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly) because "worship services amount to agency endorsement of religion" is frightening.





Do you get it now?

An article in the LA Times about how the city of Orange is taking a couple to court for removing their lawn and replacing it with less water-hungry landscaping. If you've ever read an article of this type, it's entirely familiar. The money quote's towards the end, though:

"It's just funny that we pay our taxes to the city and the city is now prosecuting us with our own money," Quan Ha said.

So near, and yet so far. Don't you get it, folks? They're the government. That's what they do.


The point is apparently just beyond their grasp

Via the BBC: Advert for 'reliable' worker 'rejected' by Jobcentre

The logical endpoint of this sort of thought is a "help wanted" ad that states: "Job available" and nothing else.

How appropriate...

The Spanish word of the day from dictionary.com is "doler" - "to hurt; to ache, to be sore".

I visited my dad last night, and managed to shovel out his back gates and a two foot wide path out about half way to the house before I admitted that I'd have to come back and finish it later. Well, "shovel" is probably inaccurate. I was using a shovel, but what I was really doing was hacking the three foot deep, packed snow snow into manageable chunks, using a shovel as my implement of destruction.

So this morning.... "Me duele!"




Since TJIC isn't around to say it right now...

... I guess that I'll just have to step up to the plate.

Public school administrators using webcams in school-issued laptops to secretly monitor students in their own homes? Noooo. They'd never violate someone's privacy that way, would they? Or treat their students as if they were criminals?

This is either an example of sheer stupidity, or incredible arrogance. Yesterday, the primary debate I saw online wasn't about if something like this would be against the law, but instead how many laws may have been broken... ranging from computer hacking, privacy violations, and all the way up to possibly violations of child pornography laws.

If it's the former, then maybe the school district needs to bring in Fances Gallo to help advise them on a proper course of resolution.

If it's the later... well. Rope.





Consent

I have made, if not a conscious effort, at least a moderate effort to steer away from commenting about politics on this blog. I want the primary focus to be on faith, technology, and whatever else happens to catch my fancy at the moment.

That said... the latest Rasmussen poll has, well, caught my fancy. Some interesting tidbits... out of all voters:

  • 61% think that the government does not have the consent of the governed
  • 71% "now view the federal government as a special interest group"
  • 75% "are angry at the policies of the federal government"
  • 63% "say it would be better for the country if most members of Congress are defeated this November."
Ouch.




<insert snark>

TJIC has, once again, given up blogging for Lent.

Coincidentally, I've been thinking this week that I need to get back into the habit of blogging, since, you know, blogging is for old people.

While I doubt that I can even come close to delivering the same amount of humor, snark, and social/political commentary as Travis... eh. Why not? I'll give it a shot.

If nothing else, anyone subjected to my blather will just find the rest of the net seems that much more enlightening in comparison.